Artists Have The Anwers?

Where we want to take this

Resultant projects and commissioned works may include (but are not limited to…):

• works that appropriate and interrogate the performativity of consultancy practices and question ideas of “resiliency,” “impact,” and “sustainability.”
• works based on interactions between individuals and “clients” — communities, institutions, companies
• works that take a critical perspective on the services and consultancy industries
• artworks that seek to influence the public sphere and public policy beyond the predetermination of cultural institutions and the market for social practice.

Some of the questions we will collectively consider are:

• The consultancy industry occupies the interfaces between corporate & governmental agents and their impact on the life and experience of society. What if we would open this interface to the intervention of artists by encouraging the strategic transfer of methods and practices?
• Artists are trained with critical tools for thinking and acting as context for their practices, yet the work developed through this is often confined by the institutions and economies of art, or their practices are reframed as artistic research by the academic industry. What if we could build a platform for resilient aesthetic and knowledge practices that enables more direct forms of impact to the wider fields of society, economy and government?
• Consultancies are a kind of cybernetic oracle, offering systems of control as services to corporations, governments and individuals. Yet, while the effects of the ongoing implementation of digital systems for control are reflected by critical theory and media art, the widespread impact of the field of consultancy services remains untouched by the critique and intervention by artists. What would artists do with access to the tools and markets of consultancies, and what would consultancies do with the input by artists?
• Under the shifting conditions of globalisation and acceleration, daily life ever more takes place on digital corporate messaging and data collection platforms. These apps allow for creative, direct interactions. What would change in artists' economies if we built a cooperative platform that produces a digital interface for direct interaction and monetisable performative works, as a dedicated frame for artists dual articulation of performative forms of knowledge practices?
• What does consulting do in the world, and how does it do it?
• Are you already a consultant? (when/where)
• What can consultants learn from artists, and how can they think about integrating artists' practices, skill sets, perspectives into their consultancy projects?
• What can artists learn from consultants, and how can they adapt or appropriate tools, techniques and frameworks from consultant practices in their performative and interaction-based work?
• In the rhetoric of art contributing to society, and the ever growing bureaucratic lust for evaluating the impact of art and its public funding, what can we critically adopt from other client-relation and performative-knowledge practices? 
• What happens when we intersect the interfaces and adapt the methodologies of consultants to address the intransparency of the consultancy industries influence on public policy and to make work that seeks to influence the political and public spheres?
• Is it appropriate or useful to describe some relations between artists and institutions “consultative” and resultant activities or projects as “consultancy”?

Schedule 

Organizers

Support